Problem Set II
1. Suppose you are a predatory spider that sits in its hole waiting for prey to pass by and that there are four types of potential prey in the environment.
| Prey Item |
Size (milligrams) |
Time to Eat (min) |
Encounter Rate (items per min) |
| Gnats |
10 |
1 |
1.0 |
| Flies |
60 |
3 |
5.0 |
| Beetle Larvae |
100 |
2 |
0.5 |
| Sweat bees |
20 |
4 |
3.0 |
a. Use a graph to show how you could predict the optimal hunting
group size for
lions. Explain all parts of the graph.
b. The average hunting group size in lions is six. Give two
explanations for why
lion group size may be higher than predicted by optimality models.
a. Construct the payoff matrix for the Dove-Bully game. Briefly explain
any assumptions you needed to make to fill out the matrix.
b. What is the ESS if V=2?
c. Could a third strategy, Hawk - in which Hawks always escalate and
pay a cost,
C, half the time they confront another Hawk, invade the population
found for 2b if
C=4? Why?
d. Construct the payoff matrix for all three strategies - Hawk, Dove
and Bully -
and describe what you think the ESS will be for this game and why.
4. The red-faced twit forms winter flocks of two individuals.
Individual twits can adopt one of two strategies: either watch for
predators or not watch. If at
least one of the pair watches, both members survive the winter. If a
twit is a member
of a flock in which neither watches, there is a 30 percent chance that
it is killed.
Non-watchers get more to eat, so if they do survive, they raise five
offspring the following
summer, whereas watchers raise only four offspring.
a) What is the payoff matrix for the watcher vs nonwatcher twit game?
b) What is the ESS and why?
Hint: The payoff matrix in this game can be expressed as the expected number of offspring produced in a season for each pairwise combination of strategies.